Psychology Politics Big Ideas

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion (Summary)

by Jonathan Haidt

Imagine your mind is a tiny rider (your rational self) perched atop a giant elephant (your intuition). You think you're steering the elephant with logic, but in reality, the elephant goes wherever it wants, and your job as the rider is to come up with a good story explaining why you meant to go there all along. This is the truth about human morality: we feel first and justify our decisions later, which is why arguing facts rarely changes anyone's mind.

Intuitions Come First, Strategic Reasoning Second

Our moral judgments are not the product of careful deliberation. They are instant, intuitive gut feelings (the elephant), which our conscious mind (the rider) then works to justify after the fact. We're not scientists seeking truth; we're lawyers building a case for our pre-existing beliefs.

Haidt describes studies of "moral dumbfounding." People are given a harmless but taboo story, like a man who has sex with a store-bought dead chicken before cooking and eating it. Everyone instantly says it's wrong, but when pressed for a logical reason (since no one was harmed), they can't find one. They end up saying, "I can't explain why, I just know it's wrong," proving the elephant made a decision long before the rider could rationalize it.

Morality Has More Than One Flavor

Modern Western societies often reduce morality to two principles: Care/Harm and Fairness/Cheating. Haidt argues there are at least six 'moral taste buds,' including Loyalty, Authority, and Sanctity. Liberals primarily rely on the first two, while conservatives use a broader palate.

A liberal might view a flag-burning protest as a valid expression of free speech, as it doesn't physically harm anyone. A conservative, however, is likely to feel an intuitive sense of revulsion because the act violates the moral foundations of Loyalty (to one's country) and Sanctity (desecrating a sacred object). Neither person is immoral; they are simply tasting the action with different moral receptors.

Morality Binds and Blinds

Morality evolved to help us cooperate within our groups, or 'hives.' This 'groupish' psychology binds us to our team and makes us effective collaborators, but it also blinds us to the truth and demonizes those in other groups.

Consider a passionate sports rivalry. Fans will see a foul committed by their own player as an accident but view the exact same action by an opponent as a malicious, deliberate act. Our moral psychology instinctively prioritizes our team's success over objective fact. This same dynamic explains the intense, often irrational nature of political and religious partisanship.

Go deeper into these insights in the full book:
Buy on Amazon
Listen to the full audio book with an Audible Free Trial.
As an Amazon Associate, qualifying purchases help support this site.